Hi Dion,
Please find the updates on the issues you have reported.
Note that, none of them are yet published on demo site. We're working on these and will update everything very shortly.Dion wrote:When using multiple facet-filters in nopAccelerate, the total-counts show the wrong numbers.
I seems like the facet-filters for Price, Manufacturer and Specification Attributes work independently from each other.
Example on demo.nopaccelerate.com:
- Go to http://demo.nopaccelerate.com/notebooks
- Change the price-filter to select notebooks between $10 and (around) $1500
- The Manufacturer-filter shows a count of (2) HP laptops, but when you select the "HP" filter, only 1 laptop will be shown. This is a bug.
- The "Memory" filter now shows a count of (1) for the "3 GB" option; however when you select this option, it shows a count of (2). But still one result is shown? What's happening here?
This issue is fixed. As you guessed, the issue was in the manufacturer filter query.
Dion wrote:- Visit http://demo.nopaccelerate.com/notebooks
- Select "HP" from the "Manufacturers" -> this will hide the "1 GB" option from "Memory" (which is as expected) and still shows the the "ASUS (100)" as multi-select in the "Manufacturers" (also as expected).
- However, when I now select the "3 GB" option from "Memory", a new option "1 GB" show up (which is _not_ expected).
- Now when I select "ASUS" from the "Manufactures", I get 0 results (now I'm completely lost :-)
Can you see what I mean? Each filter should be aware of selections made in other filters, and at the moment it's not behaving like expected.
This is caused for two different bugs.
The first one is about the condition which is applied with multi-faceting, due to which you get 0 results instead of the few products that should be available. This is also fixed.
The another is - when you select 3 GB from memory.. it shows a new option 1 GB.. which is not expected. This is actually related to the tagging for multi-faceting that is used to describe the constrains in which facets is applied. We got the issue, and at the moment working on a solution to do this tagging properly that will resolve this issue.
We will update here as soon as a we complete this and update it on our demo store and release this new build.
Once again, thank you for helping us with this!
Krunal